time travel

time travel (past) > paradox = when you go to the past you changed something that happened (mere presence of you) which meant that what really happened did not happen...
>embrace the idea of multi-existing realities...

time travel (future) > paradox? = something that has not yet supposed to happen is susceptible to "change"
>can it enbrace the idea of multi-existing realities? partly...

multi-existing realities = infinite = as time is gradually moving forward, each one of 'you' is becoming different from each other

>what if you 'visit' a 'you' that is exactly the same as you? then you have not time-traveled.

>how much is changed to the destination if you time travel? much as time goes on from the start of your arrival. not much at the beginning.

>can you travel to your own existing reality (returning to the past)? no. its not your own reality. time is part of reality.

>how about to the future? that's why i reasoned 'partly' because it is possible to become the reality where you came from or not.

>don't you create the reality you traveled? thinking about it, maybe. but there won't have been a destination to travel if the reality (destination) didn't exist first. you don't create the land, you name it. this is much the same as the issue of the chicken and the egg. it is perfectly logical to start with the chicken because it can survive on its own.